Flagship case

Braga Suite

From business request to a governed screen in the Senior X context.

Validated locally Technical-commercial MVP · Local flow validated · Real publishing under controlled validation

The problem

Anyone operating Senior X knows the cycle: a business area asks for a new view of its data, the request becomes a ticket, the ticket becomes a meeting, the meeting becomes a prototype — and weeks later the screen arrives different from what was asked. The information exists; the path to it gets lost between conversation, querying and approval.

Who it serves

Senior X customers who want to see a solution before publishing it, keeping control and traceability. Channels and consultancies that want to amplify the consultant — Braga Suite does not replace the channel: discovery, decisions, approval and the tenant relationship stay human.

The proposal

Braga Suite organizes the journey that is normally scattered. Agent v2 works with tenant-allowed capabilities, records evidence for every data-backed answer, turns the need into a reviewable screen (ScreenSpecV1) and requires approval from a second role before publishing.

The flow

Demonstration in a controlled environment with simulated or anonymized data.

Architecture and data boundaries

The browser never sees secrets: every integration (including senior-mcp, the specialized knowledge layer) lives in the BFF, server-side. Conversations are segregated by tenant and user; the orchestrator caps tools per call and demands evidence on data-backed answers; a redaction-check sweeps the whole repository for credential and identifier leaks.

Governance

Three roles — viewer, creator and publisher. Whoever creates a screen cannot approve it: self-approval is blocked by construction, not by convention. Every revision has a diff and history; publishing requires a second human.

What works today

  • Conversations segregated by tenant and user
  • Capability catalog per tenant
  • Evidence required on data-backed answers
  • Screen creation, preview, refinement and diff (ScreenSpecV1)
  • Approval by a distinct role, self-approval blocked
  • Governed simulated publishing, with a local screen route

Under controlled validation

  • Real screen publishing to Senior X
  • Live senior-mcp querying (authorized smoke test)
  • Real, authorized Senior X customer session

Future vision

  • Multi-company commercial SaaS
  • BYOK — customer brings their own model key
  • Per-tenant quotas and billing

Engineering evidence

Numbers from the local assessment of July 11, 2026 — they prove engineering consistency, not production operation.

0 tests passing on the BFF local suite · 3 skipped
0 tests on Agent v2 local frontend suite
0 files in the redaction check no leak detected

My role

Concept, integration architecture, BFF, agent orchestration, design system and workbench UX. An independent product, built for the Senior X context.

Braga Suite is an independent solution. Third-party brands and product names belong to their respective owners.

Want to evaluate a controlled pilot?

No strings attached: tell me the context and I'll tell you what can be proven first.

Evaluate a controlled pilot